Among the underlying components of the Russell 3000 index, we saw noteworthy options trading volume today in Apellis Pharmaceuticals Inc (Symbol: APLS), where a total of 7,621 contracts have traded so far, representing approximately 762,100 underlying shares. That amounts to about 42.6% of APLS’s average daily trading volume over the past month of 1.8 million shares. Particularly high volume was seen for the $85 strike call option expiring May 19, 2023, with 2,801 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 280,100 underlying shares of APLS. Below is a chart showing APLS’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $85 strike highlighted in orange:
Alcoa Corporation (Symbol: AA) saw options trading volume of 20,499 contracts, representing approximately 2.0 million underlying shares or approximately 42.1% of AA’s average daily trading volume over the past month, of 4.9 million shares.
Particularly high volume was seen for the $40 strike call option expiring June 16, 2023, with 3,116 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 311,600 underlying shares of AA. Below is a chart showing AA’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $40 strike highlighted in orange:
And Celsius Holdings Inc (Symbol: CELH) options are showing a volume of 2,541 contracts thus far today. That number of contracts represents approximately 254,100 underlying shares, working out to a sizeable 41.9% of CELH’s average daily trading volume over the past month, of 606,205 shares.
Especially high volume was seen for the $100 strike call option expiring January 19, 2024, with 593 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 59,300 underlying shares of CELH. Below is a chart showing CELH’s trailing twelve month trading history, with the $100 strike highlighted in orange:
For the various different available expirations for APLS options, AA options, or CELH options, visit StockOptionsChannel.com.
Also see:
Best Dividend Paying Stocks Analysts Like
Institutional Holders of BSJP
MTCH Options Chain
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
