Categories: Business

From votes to void: Maharashtra’s pre-election scheme sparks post-poll controversy

The State government’s “Chief Minister Majhi Ladki Bhagin” scheme, once hailed as a game-changing welfare initiative, has erupted into a political scandal. Months before the State elections, then Chief Minister Eknath Shinde, alongside his deputies Devendra Fadnavis and Ajit Pawar, funnelled a staggering ₹450 crore into the bank accounts of five lakh women. The move, celebrated at the time, helped the BJP-led alliance secure a decisive electoral victory. But now, as the ballots have long been counted, the same beneficiaries have been declared ineligible for the scheme, triggering a storm of outrage.

These five lakh women were among about 2.5 crore women who benefited from the scheme, and the government might issue more orders announcing many other women as ineligible.  

The government’s decision to disqualify five lakh women—just weeks after reaping the electoral benefits—has sparked accusations of voter bribery and misuse of public funds. Critics argue the scheme was little more than a calculated political maneuver veiled in the guise of welfare. Adding fuel to the fire, the government has announced it will not recover the ₹450 crore already disbursed, raising uncomfortable questions about accountability and intent.

Women and Child Development Minister Aditi Tatkare defended the move, asserting that the post-election scrutiny was necessary to ensure only eligible women receive benefits. According to Tatkare, the disqualified women failed to meet the scheme’s stringent criteria: some were over the age of 65, others already benefitted from existing welfare programs such as the Sanjay Gandhi Niradhar Yojana or the Namo Shakti Yojana, and a few owned four-wheelers, disqualifying them under the income cap of ₹2.5 lakh annually.

Tatkare assured that the funds given between July and December 2024 will not be reclaimed, but these women will no longer receive payments moving forward. The scheme promises a monthly stipend of ₹1,500 to eligible women aged 21 to 65, but critics have questioned the timing of the ineligibility revelation, calling it a politically motivated afterthought.

Betraying public trust

Social activists and opposition leaders have accused the government of betraying public trust and manipulating taxpayers’ money for electoral gain. Opposition leaders have been relentless in their criticism, branding the scheme a “pre-election bribe.” They argue that the government’s sudden realisation about the beneficiaries’ ineligibility, conveniently delayed until after the elections, reveals a carefully orchestrated political ploy.

As the controversy deepens, the figure of five lakh ineligible women could grow, with ongoing scrutiny expected to disqualify more beneficiaries.

Source link

nasdaqpicks.com

Recent Posts

AI-driven study abroad platform Vidysea raises $1M in seed funding

Vidysea Education Private Limited, a Noida-based AI-powered study abroad guidance platform, has secured $1 million…

3 minutes ago

Stock Market Strategy: Should investors buy the dip or turn to gold amid market correction?

The Indian stock market has been witnessing a sharp correction, with benchmark indices Sensex and…

4 minutes ago

Why UK avoids picking a side in multipolar world

This article is an on-site version of our Inside Politics newsletter. Subscribers can sign up…

5 minutes ago

Airtel Payments Bank Q3 net up 70% at ₹18.5 crore

Airtel Payments Bank (APB) has reported a 70 percent increase in net profit for the…

11 minutes ago

Stocks to buy or sell for short-term: Jay Thakkar of ICICI Sec suggests these three shares in F&O segment

Stock Market News: The Indian stock market benchmark Sensex extended its losing streak to six…

15 minutes ago

Lupin to transfer OTC consumer healthcare business to wholly owned subsidiary for ₹550-650 crore

Drugmaker Lupin is transferring its over the counter (OTC) consumer healthcare business to a wholly…

18 minutes ago