Categories: Business

Wildfire reporting and analysis in India hindered by pressing challenges, says climate expert

Climate change is widely perceived as contributing significantly to the severity and frequency of wildfires across the globe — more so in recent times in the US, Europe, and Australia — by creating warmer, drier conditions that make landscapes more susceptible.

But why is tropical India not reporting conflagrations of this scale just yet? businessline posed this question to Anjal Prakash, Clinical Associate Professor (Research) and Research Director at Bharti Institute of Public Policy, Indian School of Business (ISB). He has recently been selected as the Lead Author of the IPCC’s upcoming report on Cities and Climate Change.

How does climate change fan wildfires around the globe?

Climate change intensifies wildfires by increasing temperatures, altering precipitation patterns, and creating prolonged droughts. These factors lead to drier vegetation and extended fire seasons, enabling wildfires to spread more easily. Additionally, climate-induced weather patterns, like wind changes, further exacerbate risks worldwide.

Why is India not reporting major events unlike vulnerable same-latitude regions?

There was an incident in Uttarakhand last year. However, India may underreport wildfires due to varying detection technologies, reporting mechanisms, and public awareness. Socio-economic factors influence fire management and prioritisation. Unlike some regions in the US or Europe, India’s focus may be on other pressing challenges, hindering comprehensive wildfire reporting and analysis.

Is there a trade-off between ‘prescribed burning’ and their economic costs?

Yes, there is a trade-off. Prescribed burning aids in ecosystem health and reduces larger wildfires but incurs economic costs related to implementation, labour, and potential environmental impacts. Balancing ecological benefits against financial implications is crucial for effective management strategies and sustainable ecological practices.

How does wildfire impact storage and sequestration of carbon in natural or planted forests?

Wildfires pose significant threats to carbon sequestration in forests. They release stored carbon dioxide back into the atmosphere, contributing to climate change. Frequent or intense fires can reduce forest regeneration and biodiversity, further impairing forests’ natural ability to sequester carbon effectively.

Are adaptation and mitigation hindered by lack of local stakeholder participation?

Yes, inadequate local stakeholder involvement can hinder effective adaptation and mitigation. Engaging communities ensures strategies align with local needs and knowledge. Building partnerships, conducting outreach, and encouraging collaboration can empower stakeholders, enhance ownership, and ensure more effective climate action and resilience-building initiatives.

How can responsibility and risk be distributed to ensure best possible adaptation strategy?

Responsibility can be distributed through collaborative frameworks that define roles for governments, communities, and private sectors. Clear communication, shared resources, and joint planning can help identify risks and develop strategies that utilise varied expertise, promoting balanced adaptation efforts across stakeholders and enhancing community resilience.

While managing risk, do mandates and objectives work against each other?

Tensions often arise between economic development and environmental protection. Mandates may prioritise immediate economic gains, conflicting with long-term sustainability objectives. Balancing short-term pressures with long-term resilience demands transparent dialogue, stakeholder involvement, and integrated strategies addressing diverse mandates harmoniously.

Can integrated fire management inform climate change mitigation/adaptation strategies?

Integrated fire management (IFM) incorporates fire prevention, preparedness, suppression, and recovery into broader land management practices. IFM considers climatic influences, ecosystem health, and community values, providing comprehensive strategies for both wildfire management and climate change adaptation, enhancing resilience to future fire-related challenges.

Precautions to wildfire risk and emergency response are two sides the same coin. Do you agree?

Absolutely, a precautionary approach ensures proactive risk assessment and planning, enhancing emergency response efficacy. Treating wildfire risk management and emergency response as interconnected allows for cohesive strategies. This integration supports comprehensive planning, timely reactions, and ultimately improves containment effectiveness during wildfire events.

Published on February 17, 2025

Source link

nasdaqpicks.com

Recent Posts

Bullet Train Project: Delays in train design & procurement slowdown progress; negotiations on with Japan

India’s multi-crore Bullet Train project is delayed following non –availability of trains from Japan, and…

19 seconds ago

Europeans will need to decide which Russian sanctions to keep

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for freeYour guide to what the 2024 US election…

6 minutes ago

Smart window changes colour, stores energy

Researchers have developed advanced self-charging smart windows that change colour and store energy, offering a…

9 minutes ago

All eyes on AP’s Budget FY26 as CM Naidu struggles to strike a balance between welfare schemes and development

As Andhra Pradesh Assembly Budget sessions are set to begin on Monday, all eyes are…

16 minutes ago

American hardwood furniture with personal ‘talismanic’ inlays

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for freeRoula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories…

21 minutes ago

Godrej Enterprises to invest ₹200 crore more in Dahej facility

Godrej Enterprises Group will invest an additional ₹200 crore to expand its manufacturing facility in…

22 minutes ago